Busy doesn’t mean productive. The real skill is deciding which things deserve your time and which don’t. I’m in charge of the marketing efforts for an entire business unit, which includes 200+ products distributed among four product lines. On this scale, putting in more effort isn’t a viable strategy since there’s always more work than any team can possibly complete.
If you let the most urgent request determine the agenda, you’ll remain busy every day while the figures that really matter fail to improve. The only thing that can scale is a system. The principle is simple: Each task must justify its inclusion. An item doesn’t take up my time, my team’s time, or a slot in the sprint simply because it exists or because someone has requested it.
The data shows how much time gets pulled away from strategic work. According to the Asana Anatomy of Work Index, employees spend around 60% of their time on work and only 14% on strategy. Additionally, a TMetric study reports that 16.85% of productive capacity is devoted to meetings. It’s the kind of work that actually advances the business that gets squeezed.
The way to change that is to start with the objectives that matter, then decide which tasks deserve a place on the agenda.
The world’s most powerful SEO platform, purpose-built for Enterprise.
Begin with the objectives
Tasks are too granular to be the starting point. Before I agree to take on or assign any work, I need to see the objectives and key results (OKR) and the related key performance indicators (KPIs).
In our project management tool, each OKR is converted into an epic, ensuring that all tasks have a place within the system. For example, one of this quarter’s objectives is to optimize funnel efficiency and revenue per user.
We break down the objectives into specific key results, such as “increase the download-to-trial-activation rate by 20% by reducing onboarding friction,” and only then break those down into concrete tasks: redesigning the install-success pages, releasing a product-activation FAQ, and restructuring the download pages.
Overcome the brain’s tendency to prefer things that are easy and urgent
The difficult part isn’t the framework. It’s your own brain, which tends to select the task that’s either the simplest or the most prominent and then treats it as urgent. True productivity generally comes from fewer tasks with greater impact.
Each time a new request appears, I ask myself one question before adding it to the list: What metric does this action affect, and by how much? If I can’t give an answer in a single sentence, then it isn’t included on the list.
I calculate the ROI in terms of effort exactly as I do with a marketing budget. A task that takes two days and results in a 0.5% improvement to a KPI is less worthwhile than one that takes only two hours and achieves the same 0.5% improvement to the KPI. When this kind of calculation becomes second nature, the idea of being busy no longer seems like a virtue.
I establish a hierarchy in my calendar. Instead of having an unlimited number of priorities, I set a fixed number of strategic ones for each time period — three for the quarter, three for the month, three for the week, and three for the day. These aren’t the most urgent ones, but those that have the greatest effect on the annual plan.
They’re growth-oriented tasks, meaning they’re the kind of work that should result in a higher number rather than routine activity. The three daily priorities get the first concentrated blocks in the morning, while the weekly, monthly, and quarterly ones get recurring slots that no other commitment can take.
The three-task limit is important as it forces me to make a choice. Steve Jobs expressed this clearly when he said that focus doesn’t mean saying “yes” to the thing you’re working on. It means saying “no” to the other hundred good ideas. If there’s a fourth important task, then it means that something is wrong.
Gradually and systematically pass the routine on to the AI
Rather than pursuing hype, view automation as a disciplined backlog in which the most important tasks are always dealt with first.
When a high-priority automation can’t be carried out immediately, it isn’t ignored. It’s specifically included in the roadmap to keep it on the agenda. This systematic method directs resources toward the work with the greatest potential impact.
The AI process map
I achieve this by using a live AI process map that gives a clear overview of all marketing tasks. The main record keeps specific metadata, so it’s possible to calculate the percentage of tasks that are automated or waiting to be acted upon:
- Current state: (Manual, AI-assisted, or AI-automated)
- Should AI have ownership of it? (Yes, Maybe, or No)
- Status: (Not started, In progress, Piloting, or Done)
- Priority and owner: This ensures accountability.
The execution cycle
To transform intent into a measurable roadmap, we run a continuous execution loop centered on strict prioritization and scheduling:
- Deal with the highest priority first: We audit the map so high-impact “Not started” items go directly into the current cycle. If constraints prevent us from carrying out the task immediately, we place it in “Scheduled” with a fixed start date.
- Pilot and progress: Priority items undergo a pilot phase, during which we test them under real-world conditions. If they’re successful, they move on to “Done” and add to our total automation percentage.
- Keep judgment-intensive work, such as brand strategy and final editing, explicitly assigned as “Human by design” to ensure quality.
- Treat every automation as a reusable asset so it delivers compounding value over time.
By tracking the status of every process — manual, AI-assisted, or AI-automated — we can precisely calculate the share of tasks that are automated, in pilot, or pending, converting broad intentions into a specific, actionable roadmap.
| Process name | Current state | Should AI have ownership of it? | Status |
| Keyword research and clustering | AI-automated | Yes | Done |
| Competitor monitoring | AI-automated | Yes | Done |
| AI Overview (GEO) analysis | AI-automated | Yes | Done |
| First-draft content and briefs | AI-assisted | Yes | Piloting |
| Email personalization | AI-assisted | Yes | Piloting |
| Content final review | Manual | Maybe | Human by design |
| PR and influencer relationships | Manual | No | Human by design |
Use your project management tool as a filter
Whether your team uses Jira, Asana, Trello, ClickUp, or Monday, the goal is to filter tasks by priority. That’s where a task proves its real-world value. Before adding anything to a sprint, pass it through three strict gates:
- What OKR and KPI does it contribute to?
- Is this the most effective thing I can do this sprint?
- Is the value reusable or one-off?
When a task has passed all three tests, it’s included in the sprint. If it hasn’t, it’s placed in the backlog, sent to another team, or marked as “Will Not Do.”
Scrum isn’t exclusively for IT teams
All areas of the business, including marketing, sales, customer success, HR, finance, and operations, benefit from an agile cycle with clear priorities and owners.
In the marketing team, we hold monthly sprints. At the beginning of each month, we work out what we’re committing to, identify the quarterly OKR and KPI that each task supports, decide who’s responsible, and determine what will be paused.
It also makes it easier to maintain boundaries. If somebody turns up with a sudden request, instead of responding with “I’m too busy,” I ask, “This isn’t part of the current sprint. Which KPI does it relate to, and what should we shift to free up space?” If it doesn’t relate to a KPI, it might still be useful, but it is probably not urgent. That way, I can keep my focus without relying on my willpower.
Focus on the reality
Planning reveals one’s intentions, while keeping track of time shows the facts, such as how much time was actually spent on high-priority work, which projects exceeded their schedules, and the places where the team is saying yes too frequently.
Each month, I export my own report from TMetric and then check how the hours were distributed: by task and, most importantly, the proportion allocated to growth work compared with routine work. I set a minimum level rather than an aim: growth work must account for at least 20% of my time. If it falls below this level, then routine has made a comeback, and I look first at the remaining 80% to decide what should be automated or rejected.
That floor isn’t merely theoretical. Before we began measuring it, a person could carry out work with almost no growth for an entire month, and no one would have noticed because the calendar was completely full. After we started tracking it and set a target, we established a protected 20% minimum for the team, and as a result, some people are now performing well above that figure.
Each quarter, we conduct the same check across the department. If anyone is below the 20% threshold, their manager will look into the matter. The criterion isn’t the number of hours worked but where those hours were spent. This turns the statement “I feel busy” into a figure and provides everyone with an objective, impersonal way to discuss their workload.
The one habit underneath it all
The entire system boils down to one habit: make each task justify its existence before it takes up your time. Challenge each task before you start it. Achieve more with less effort. Don’t rush into things. Think first.
Work out the ROI of your efforts and let the AI handle the rest. This habit separates appearing busy from doing the most important work of the year.
I run marketing for a business unit far too big to muscle through. This system is what makes it manageable. My hope is that it helps other leaders spend their teams’ best hours on the work that actually moves the business.
Here’s the scorecard I use to measure the system
| Strategic focus | Growth tasks as a share of tracked time | ≥ 20% |
| Task validation | Sprint tasks linked to a quarterly OKR and KPI | 100% |
| Effort ROI | Measure ROI of your efforts | Positive ROI |
| Priority cap | Strategic tasks per horizon (Q / M / W / D) | 3 each, no more |
| Automation | Routine hours moved to AI/workflows | Rising MoM |
| Plan versus reality | Planned priority hours versus tracked hours | Gap closing |
The post How to decide what’s important when everything is urgent appeared first on MarTech.