The real GTM advantage is owning language and signal

Man sitting at a desk making a decision reading a folder

In B2B marketing, deals are usually decided before the funnel begins. The vendor that shapes how buyers define the problem wins before evaluation starts.

The Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman proved that every decision runs on two systems at once:

  • System 1 is fast, intuitive thinking that shapes initial preference. It’s the brand that comes to mind before you go looking. The language buyers use to describe the problem internally. The sense that one vendor understands their world and another doesn’t.
  • System 2 is slower, analytical thinking that evaluates options. The evaluation criteria. The demo. The RFP. The pricing negotiation. It’s the funnel.

Most marketing teams ignore that System 1 determines who enters System 2. In simpler terms, that means that the vendor whose language the buyer uses to describe the problem wins before the evaluation begins.

The data is clear. In enterprise deals, the winning vendor is already on the buyer’s shortlist 95% of the time before the first sales conversation happens, per 6sense’s 2025 Buyer Experience Report. Four out of five deals are won by whoever arrived first. Forrester’s State of Business Buying named it exactly: B2B buying is a process of confirmation, not selection.

The decision is often made before the funnel opens. The funnel was built to measure System 2. In 2008, we didn’t have the tools to measure System 1, so we measured what we could, built our scorecards around it and called it marketing.

The decision to measure funnel activity rather than buyer perception, made over 15 years, is the root of every problem marketing is dealing with right now.

Decision authority moved before budgets followed

Teams grew because the platforms were hard to run. Headcount followed the tool stack. That was rational. But as teams grew, the boundaries moved.

Analytics moved to finance. Customer insight moved to product. Sales started writing its own sequences. Each change made local sense.

The shift wasn’t in the budget — it was in the thinking. Product owned the customer insight. Sales owned the market narrative. Data owned the numbers. Marketing owned the production schedule.

The org chart still said marketing. The authority had moved somewhere else entirely, one sensible decision at a time.

The problem is now harder to ignore. System 2 work is being automated: Campaign optimization. Sequence management. Attribution modeling. Content production. The skills the SaaS decade rewarded are becoming table stakes at best and automated at worst.

The function that defines itself by System 2 execution is watching that work get automated.

What remains is System 1. The language buyers use before they go looking. The intelligence that explains why customers buy, stay and expand. Not what they say on the exit survey. The real reason.

This is the work marketing was built to own. It’s also the work marketing gave up. The companies taking it back right now are building advantages AI can’t replicate and competitors can’t buy.

Your customers search everywhere. Make sure your brand shows up.

The SEO toolkit you know, plus the AI visibility data you need.

Start Free Trial
Get started with

Semrush One Logo

Durable GTM advantage comes from state and signal

The 4S Framework identifies four sources of durable GTM advantage: state, scale, system and signal. Marketing directly controls two of them: state and signal.

The four sources of defensible GTM advantage

State: Owning the language of the problem

State is the language buyers use to define a problem before engaging vendors.
It’s the category language your market uses before it goes looking. It’s not brand awareness or share of voice. Instead, these are the words buyers use to explain the problem internally, in Slack messages and board presentations, before they ever talk to a vendor.

Gong is a great example. Before Gong, sales teams talked about call recording and pipeline visibility. Gong reframed it as revenue intelligence. Once that happened, competitors had to argue against Gong’s framing before they could describe their own product.

State doesn’t come from a campaign, but from a marketing team that owns customer research and publishes what they find before anyone else has language for it. Marketing loses state the moment product starts writing positioning, and Sales starts writing content.

The test is simple: do competitors use your language to describe the problem you solve? If they don’t, you’re building inside someone else’s category.

Signal: Understanding why revenue happens

Signal is the understanding of why customers buy, stay and expand. You have dashboards that show you what happened. Signal tells you why. 

The difference between correlation and causation is the difference between a report and a decision. B2B has been measuring marketing based on correlation dressed up as insight for 20 years. 

When the signal is weak, the symptoms are predictable. Net revenue retention stalls below 110% because no one identifies at-risk customers before they decide to leave. Customer acquisition cost payback stretches past 24 months because programs keep running with no model connecting them to what’s actually moving buyers.

When those numbers show up on the board deck, the CFO looks at marketing spend first because marketing can’t prove it isn’t wasteful. A marketing leader who owns the why owns the budget conversation because she has numbers, finance can’t dispute.

Two questions reveal whether marketing owns the strategy

Two questions, answer them honestly:

  • Who owns market research in your company?
    • If the answer is “product” or “nobody,” you’ve started losing state. The fix is one recurring session: marketing reviews what customers and competitors said, and whether the category language still fits. Two hours a month. That session doesn’t exist in most companies.
  • Does a measurement model exist connecting your top programs to revenue, one that finance built with you and actually trusts? 
    • If it doesn’t, your signal is broken and your budget conversation next quarter will be a negotiation, not a data discussion.

Marketing lost the thinking function slowly, one sensible decision at a time. Getting it back works the same way.

Funnels measure decisions, state determines who gets the decision and signal determines who keeps the customer. Everything else is execution.

That’s not a brand strategy. That’s the only revenue strategy left.


Key takeaways

  • Most B2B deals are decided before formal evaluation begins.
  • Buyers choose vendors based on the language they use to define the problem.
  • Funnels measure evaluation, but they do not determine who enters it.
  • Marketing’s advantage comes from owning category language and understanding why customers buy.
  • AI is automating execution, increasing the importance of strategic ownership.

The post The real GTM advantage is owning language and signal appeared first on MarTech.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *